|
I think the potential of wind power is a much hyped resource and
a good tool for the bureaucracy to make good money. I could not
hide the smile when I read an article which says we have a potential
of over 46 thousand MW. In 1997, when I did a study for the Ministry
of Non-Conventional Energy Sources (MNES), this figure was 20,000
MW. I dont know how it doubled itself within five years.
Only some pockets in the country have windy locations and it is
not windy all through the year. So, the capacity utilization is
usually less than 20% of the installed capacity. Secondly, these
windly pockets are so small that you really cannot install turbines
to tap the entire potential. Even the total area where power exists
is 1% of our country's geographical area. Where do we have place
to install the turbines, even asuming all of them are 0.75MW (the
extremely large ones). So, all this statistics of 46,092 MW is not
achievable energy potential. The reality is only a small fraction.
In the mid-90`s, when the European countries had saturated their
windpower markets and were looking for better avenues, India (with
some vested interested bureaucrats) offered the right conditions.
So, our country practically laid a red carpet to welcome them by
announcing customs
exemption on several components, 100% accelarated depreciation,
10-year tax holiday on power sales, attractive power purchase agreement,
wheeling and banking, etc. The state governments added their own
incentives in form of sales tax exemption.
The net result was, with all these incentives, at zero generation,
the internal rate of return (IRR) was as high as 7.5% (for Gujarat).
Zero generation is possible when
(1) the place where the turbine is installed is not right or
(2) there is no turbine at all!!
When I was looking at the generation figures for the different
installations at a station called Lamba (in Rajkot), there were
more than half with zero units generated for the entire year, with
March showing a magical 5 units or 4 or some such odd numbers. This
is because, March is the financial year ending and the companies
who have invested, to get the incentives have to show some generation.
Further, what is shocking is, there were atleast about 25 to 35%
of lease-financing companies that were listed in the investors.
These are certainly not energy intensive companies who are looking
for alternative energy sources to meet their requirements. These
were companies that were interested in the incentives and not in
power generation. Not surprising therefore that the installations
(where such installations actually are
standing) are not being managed at all.
researcher from TERI (who also was involved in this study) remarked
that several of the "installations" are actually not there
on the field!!! Now you know how the bureaucracy was getting part
of their money??? The other part comes from the international (read
European) companies that were more than greasing the palms.
Following my presentation in MNES, the Ministry of Finance announced
Minimum Alternative Tax (MAT) and what followed later was a complete
collapse of the once thriving investment avenue. In fact a few companies
that came up to support wind turbine industry also had to close
their shops.
If India indeed had so much of wind power, why are the heavy energy-intensive
industries not investing in this so called "potential"?
These figures that get released are often misleading, and the country's
economy is getting compromised with all these "bending backward"
fiscal
incentives!! I see these revised figures of 46 thousand MW as yet
another attempt by the international markets to make our governments
lay another round of the red carpet for them to walk with dirty
boots.
The total installed capacity of power in India (including thermal,
hydel and nuclear) is not more than 65,000 MW. True, we are a generally
power-deficit state. But, if you take a close look into the power
supplying utilities books, you will notice more than a third of
the power is lost as "T&D". In the past, agriculture
sector was blamed for this entire transmission and distribution
(T&D) loss.
After the World Bank insisted on energy audits, non-agricultural
states like Delhi showed 52% T&D loss and Orissa had over 48%
(agri consumption here accounts for less than 5% of total power
supplied). In Andhra Pradesh, after the energy audit, the T&D
losses shot up
from 19.2% to 33.3%. (I dont know, how it is exactly 33.3%). But
in the subsequent years, this T&D losses started to miraculously
improve, although there were no efforts to reduce them by investments
for improving the T&D infrastructure. In fact, in this state,
during the year when energy audit was undertaken (1996), the revenues
actually shot up from 66% to 82% and then again began to decline.
The reason for this shoot in the revenues is because during this
year, HT and LT consumption increased significantly. But 1996 was
neither a year when there was a spurt in industrial activities in
AP nor did agriculture suffer any recession. Then why have agri
figures
fallen and industrial power consumprion shot up??
Again, what made industrial power consumption figures to start
falling down again in the subsequent years with a matching increase
in agricultural consumption? The figures that are available in the
official statistics of APTRANSCO shows that the power utilities
are managing the statistics to show that we are net energy-deficit
state and that agriculture sector is the main culprit!!!
Although we are power-deficit state, I dont think we are in a near-crisis
like situation, which the power utilities want us to believe. By
reducing T&D losses, much of the power crisis would simply evaporate.
We are talking about losses as huge as 52% in Delhi, over a third
in AP and so
on.....Instead of compromising on our economy on the premise that
we have power crisis and let the European markets benefit, we should
really begin to look at the problem in its right perspective. The
truth is, our energy economy is case of bad management made worse
by bad statistics. What we need is guts to ask the right questions
and get the statistics corrected.
Probably, we might end up saying, "We really have no crisis
of power".
Coming to wind power, I am afraid, the figures for potential are
nowhere close to truth.
|